CityofHoboken.com
Home
N.J. Election
Law
Campaign Finance |

Ann Graham of People for Open Government
Campaign Finance
Reform
Passes By 9 to 1 Margin
Hoboken Victory Sends a Quake
Throughout the State ;
Are there any Tricks Left?
The people spoke and the politicians quickly shut up after a small
band of citizens calling themselves People
for Open Government managed to win at the polls on Nov. 2.
It took two rounds in court and several city council meetings, the
People for Open Government (POG) just to place it's
referendum for campaign finance reform on the ballot. By law the ordinance
they proposed by petition appeared on the
ballot as a binding referendum. The law cannot be
changed for three years.
Pay-for-Play, or the appearance of trading campaign contributions for
no bid city contracts has always cast a shadow of mistrust on elected
officials. Mayors, county political bosses and even the governor have
denied that there is any conflict but their behavior surrounding the referendum
has not helped their argument and could be described as obstructionist.
Round One: Council Rejects Reforms
In September the People for Open Government were present at a city
council meeting when Fourth Ward city councilman Chris Campos rejected
their ordinance. His behavior at the meeting has brought him strong criticism
from some of Hoboken's most respected citizen activists.
Instead of supporting the POG referendum Campos sponsored his own
less restrictive Pay-for-Play ordinance. The city council voted to place
it on this November's ballot next to the POG's referendum.
Round Two: POG Wins in Court
POG took the city council to superior court claiming that the council
has no right to place a question on the ballot. POG won.
Hudson County superior court judge Maurice Gallipoli
found that while the Hoboken City Council has the
right to vote on ordinances, it does not have a
right to place ordinances on the ballot as
referendums.
Appearing for the
city council, attorney Denis Murphy could not cite a
single statute that would allow a city council to
place questions on the ballot. When asked by
the judge to do so Murphy replied "If I could
cite it, your Honor I would."
Appearing for the
People for Open Government, attorneys Renee
Steinhagen of New Jersey Appleseed
Public Interest Law Center and former mayoral
candidate Ira Karasick , called it a typical
Hudson County machine trick to dilute the ballot and
confuse the voters.
The judge found that
the city council was doing nothing more than trying
to interfere with the process.
The most lighthearted
moment came when Judge Gallipoli said of the
the POG ordinance "What person in his
right mind would vote against this thing?"
Round Three: One Machine or Two?
Someone in Hoboken city hall wrote a Pay-for-Play
ballot question that was too long to fit on the ballot. So the county
clerk was forced to put the referendum on a second machine which would
have voters standing in a second line.
The People for Open Government cried foul and again landed
in front of Judge Gallipoli.
Gallipoli's staff managed to rewrite
the question so it could fit onto the machine. POG and the county clerk
agreed to the change on Oct.4.
County Clerk Javier Inclan told the judge he was
obligated to place the question as the Hoboken city clerk presented it
to him.
Sour Grapes?
Mayor Roberts support of the referendum could be
described best as lukewarm. Back and fourth attacks in the letters
column of the Hoboken Reporter continue. Roberts claiming that his
former campaign manager and city CFO Michael Lenz is a hypocrite.
Supporters of the referendum pointing out all the barriers that Roberts
and his allies on the city council put into place to keep the voters
away from the referendum.
Either way the Hoboken win has raised eyebrows across
the state. At a Pay for Play seminar at the NJ League of Municipalities,
Hoboken was the city everyone wanted to hear from-six Hoboken residents were in the audience.
Mayors and attorneys from other municipalities were
not happy with the seminar. One Hudson county mayor walked out of
the seminar. His aide stayed behind and made sarcastic remarks.
|
Joan
Verplanck, the president of the state Chamber of
Commerce, called the practice legalized extortion.
"Pay
to play is the single biggest blight on New Jersey.
...It's time to clean it up," Verplanck said.
NJ Commerce News
State Senate's Action May Kill
Hoboken's Pay-to-Play Law.
The following is an email CityofHoboken.com received
from the Quality of Life Coalition
In November the people of Hoboken voted 9 to 1 to control
the amount of money that those doing business
with the city are allowed to donate to politicians
and political parties. A so-called pay
to play law passed in Trenton last year that
effects state-level contributions to politicians
and political parties is to take effect in January
2006. That law also hurts us here in Hoboken
since it takes precedence over our local law
and makes it moot. We have to stop that
from happening. Here's how.
Bill S-1987 can address this
problem. It will protect current
laws already adopted at the local level and
provide authority for municipalities as well as
school boards, independent authorities and
fire districts to have pay to play laws. We
need to support this legislation sponsored by
Senators Vitale, Inverso, Turner, Baer and Codey
(the latter is acting Governor as well as Senate
President).
Here's how to support S 1987. Send a
letter to:
Acting Governor Richard Codey and Senate
President
Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 001
Trenton, NJ 08625
Dear Governor Codey:
I urge you in your dual roles as Acting
Governor and Senate President to post Senate Bill
S-1987 for a vote on Monday,
February 14, 2005. This bill will provide us
in Hoboken as well as in 34 other municipalities
with the preservation of pay to play legislation
already passesd. It will provide the right
for all citizens throughout the state to
initiate strong and effective pay to play reform
at the local and county levels.
We need your determination and legislative
skills to get this legislation passed.
The State at every level of govenrment needs
effective pay to play laws. Please post
S-1987 immediately. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Please copy this text or create your
own but whatever you do, send a letter today.
As always, many thanks for taking care of Hoboken.
You really can make it happen.
Helen Manogue, Coordinator
Quality of LIfe Coalition
McGreevey Signs Order to Ban
Pay-for-Play;
Ban Applies to State Contracts;
County Bosses May Still Feel the Effects
Holding all the political chips as
a lame duck Governor, Jim McGreevey signed executive
order no. 1,000 placing limits on contributions from
state vendors and contractors.
Anyone who donates to either a
county or state party or a gubernatorial candidate
is banned from accepting any contract worth
$17,500 from the state for 18 months.
The ban goes into effect on
October 15, 2004.
Vendors or contractors can still
make contributions directly to an individual
candidate for municipal, county or state legislative
office. The ban on donations to county parties
however might be most effective however.
Who is Giving to Our
Elected Officials?
Hoboken Democratic Party
Mayor David Roberts, Chairperson
$240,000 as of 12/21/03
Attorneys: $73,100
Developers: $56,600
Architects: $13,500
Political Organizations: $12,700
Insurance Co.: $15,100
Eng/Planners: $3,500 ( 2004 total only)
City Contractors: $53,500 Friends
of David Roberts
Political Committees $21,000 Hoboken
United Council 2003
$318,324 as of June 6, 2003
Developers: $78,500
Political Organizations: $76,000
Attorneys: $63,500
Eng/planners:$32,000
Architects: $21,000
Lobbyists: $14,000
Rest./bars: $11,398
Pay-to-Play
Ordinance to be
Heard by City Council
The People for Open Government,
POG, is a grassroots organization. POG collected
over 1,000 signatures calling for the passage of an ordinance
that would limit campaign contributions from city
vendors and call for competitive bidding on city
contracts. The city council failed to pass the POG
ordinance and by law must now appear on the Nov. 3rd
ballot.
City
councilman Chris Campos critized the POG and then sponsored a
less restictive bill which the city council voted to place it on the Nov. 3rd
ballot. There will now be two very similar referendums
on the ballot which may be confusing to the voters.
The following is an Email from
POG to CityofHoboken.com.
The Hoboken City Council is seeking to undermine
a public initiative that would put limits on the
practice of pay to play. At the City Council
meeting on Wednesday night, September 1, there will
be a public hearing and final vote on an ordinance
designed to confuse voters and water-down the
citizen initiated pay to play ordinance that will be
on the ballot November 2.
Hoboken United and the Hoboken Democratic Party have
collected over $1.1 million in campaign
contributions since the spring of 2001. Many
of those contributing have been rewarded with city
contracts, zoning and planning board approvals and
access to those in power. As a result, City
Hall is representing the business interests of its
political supporters. The interests of
ordinary Hoboken residents are being
disregarded. Join us in putting an end to this
practice.
|
Visit
the POG website
View
the POG Pay-for-Play ordinance in .pdf format
Read
the Executive Order and the Announcement of Governor McGreevey that Bans
Pay-for-Play
Come
to the public hearing on September 1 on 'pay to
play' ordinance by Ann Graham
August 29, 2004
Buying
influence at Hoboken City Hall by
Ron Hine May 25, 2003
Hoboken
Campaign Reform on November Ballot The Hoboken Reporter
August
15, 2004
|